Just' Words?
Once again the almighty state breaks up another family because they can't tax another stay-at-home mom. (link)
In this case multiple stay-at-home moms. Which adds up to a lot of tribute for the I.R.S. and The Fed once these moms are given state jobs and taxed on their slave wages. Why else does the government engage in affairs of the heart? What business does government have regulating the choices made between two consenting adults? Why are there even polygamy laws in this country? It's nobody's business what other people choose, so long as it's not William Hung. I assure you its not to protect anyone, least of all the young ones.
Make no mistake about it, this was a hostile takeover, not a rescue operation.
We need an independent and public review; of any allegations of abuse; and situations leading up to this raid; before any deliberation can be made in the court of public opinion, much less a court of law. We don't want another Ruby Ridge and Branch Davidian fiasco spoon-fed to the American people as another "mission accomplished," by the spin meisters, covering up their own criminal misconduct.
It is well known that local and federal law enforcement have engaged in placing their own distress calls, overtly and covertly, just before embarking on illegitimate operations, so they'd have legal cover, from which to conduct what would otherwise be a warrantless or illegal undertaking. They don't need a warrant if there is a distress call made. If you are being killed in your home the police don't need a warrant to come save you. So what do they do to forgo a warrant? Place a distress call to themselves and use that in a court of law as cover for any illegal misconduct. It's a known dirty trick employed by law enforcement, and neighbors, and written about in several books by former cops.
Till this day people still think the Branch Davidians set themselves on fire at Waco, Texas - that they chose to "kill themselves rather than be taken alive." This purveying popular misconception (mith), held by the majority of Americans till this day, is false and in stark contrast to evidence presented at the hearings tasked with investigating what happened at Waco that fateful day. Even evidence NOT presented implicates the FBI in a cover up: the committee is still waiting to be furnish with evidence that would support disputed testimony given by ATF agents of shots being fired on their position just before they were forced to to raid the Branch Davidian ranch; namely the front door with all the bullet holes, reputed to have both entrance as well as exit bullet-holes from the Branch Davidians shooting through the door at ATF agents casually hanging out outside.
The documentary "WACO: The Rules of Engagement" does a thorough investigation (far better than any news organization has) of what is freely available to anybody willing to research for themselves what really happened at Waco.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4298137966377572665
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1755692679103175934
Also, I couldn't help but notice similar language, once fed to the media by the FBI back in 1993; in order to militarize a non military situation at Waco, being recycled today. News organizations seem content with regurgitating the ol' government line rather than doing any real investigative journalism of their own. Words like "property/ranch" and "group" are suddenly transmuted into "compound"and "sect" by the masters of rhetoric in order to gain tacit approval, from the general viewing public, for heavy handed government.
Vilify someone as a pedophile and people seem not to care if he/she is actually guilty of these charges - they just want his/her head run over with a tank tred.
Justice... served?
Stay tuned...
(Apologies to anyone of you who threw up while reading this post. This is for those of you still in the good fight - those moms fighting against the dogma - you know who you are. Don't give up. Here's something from my youth to sooth you over, from me to you! *I'm pandering again*)
In this case multiple stay-at-home moms. Which adds up to a lot of tribute for the I.R.S. and The Fed once these moms are given state jobs and taxed on their slave wages. Why else does the government engage in affairs of the heart? What business does government have regulating the choices made between two consenting adults? Why are there even polygamy laws in this country? It's nobody's business what other people choose, so long as it's not William Hung. I assure you its not to protect anyone, least of all the young ones.
Make no mistake about it, this was a hostile takeover, not a rescue operation.
We need an independent and public review; of any allegations of abuse; and situations leading up to this raid; before any deliberation can be made in the court of public opinion, much less a court of law. We don't want another Ruby Ridge and Branch Davidian fiasco spoon-fed to the American people as another "mission accomplished," by the spin meisters, covering up their own criminal misconduct.
It is well known that local and federal law enforcement have engaged in placing their own distress calls, overtly and covertly, just before embarking on illegitimate operations, so they'd have legal cover, from which to conduct what would otherwise be a warrantless or illegal undertaking. They don't need a warrant if there is a distress call made. If you are being killed in your home the police don't need a warrant to come save you. So what do they do to forgo a warrant? Place a distress call to themselves and use that in a court of law as cover for any illegal misconduct. It's a known dirty trick employed by law enforcement, and neighbors, and written about in several books by former cops.
Till this day people still think the Branch Davidians set themselves on fire at Waco, Texas - that they chose to "kill themselves rather than be taken alive." This purveying popular misconception (mith), held by the majority of Americans till this day, is false and in stark contrast to evidence presented at the hearings tasked with investigating what happened at Waco that fateful day. Even evidence NOT presented implicates the FBI in a cover up: the committee is still waiting to be furnish with evidence that would support disputed testimony given by ATF agents of shots being fired on their position just before they were forced to to raid the Branch Davidian ranch; namely the front door with all the bullet holes, reputed to have both entrance as well as exit bullet-holes from the Branch Davidians shooting through the door at ATF agents casually hanging out outside.
The documentary "WACO: The Rules of Engagement" does a thorough investigation (far better than any news organization has) of what is freely available to anybody willing to research for themselves what really happened at Waco.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4298137966377572665
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1755692679103175934
Also, I couldn't help but notice similar language, once fed to the media by the FBI back in 1993; in order to militarize a non military situation at Waco, being recycled today. News organizations seem content with regurgitating the ol' government line rather than doing any real investigative journalism of their own. Words like "property/ranch" and "group" are suddenly transmuted into "compound"and "sect" by the masters of rhetoric in order to gain tacit approval, from the general viewing public, for heavy handed government.
Vilify someone as a pedophile and people seem not to care if he/she is actually guilty of these charges - they just want his/her head run over with a tank tred.
Justice... served?
Stay tuned...
(Apologies to anyone of you who threw up while reading this post. This is for those of you still in the good fight - those moms fighting against the dogma - you know who you are. Don't give up. Here's something from my youth to sooth you over, from me to you! *I'm pandering again*)
